For Acharya's Main Website, go to
TruthBeKnown.com

TBK News Table of Contents

Bookmark and Share
Join the TBK Mailing List!
Enter your name and email address below to receive news and cutting edge commentary from Acharya!

Name:
Email:
Subscribe  Unsubscribe 

Friday, August 06, 2010

HORUS IS A SUN GOD!!!

HORUS IS A SUN GOD!!!

As is the case with many gods in other parts of the world, several Egyptian gods (and goddesses) possess solar attributes, essentially making them sun gods. These Egyptian sun gods included not only the commonly known Ra or Re, but also Osiris and Horus, among others. This fact of Horus as a sun god was confirmed five centuries before the common era by the Greek historian Herodotus (2.144, 156), when he equated Osiris with the Greek god Dionysus and Horus with the Greek sun god Apollo: "In Egyptian, Apollo is Horus, Demeter is Isis, Artemis is Bubastis…."

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

Solar attributes? How about the burning bush does not burn because it is empty inside? How did the writers of Ecclesiastes know there is no new thing under the sun?

Anonymous said...

You are a talented writer, but you miss some mathematical puzzles. I was just looking at the book on your blog titled Jesus as the sun. Christ in the center is also in a circle. This is a mathematical puzzle found in anamorphic art. Check out the Internet, it is teeming with pictures of a cylinder in a circle in 3D. This is an important problem because the Pythagorean Theorem does not compute in a flat plane. People use it as an f(x) which is two dimensional, but f(x,y)=x^2+y^2 which is 3D. The closer you get to the origin, the more it does not compute in the horizontal plane.

Anonymous said...

The anamorphic cylinder in a circle can be found in Genesis when Joseph had a dream. His sheaf stood up while his brothers stood round about and the heavens made obeisance to him.

You can also see it in unicorn tapestries. The riddle is under peoples noses and they cannot see it.

Anonymous said...

The area of a unit circle is 2*pi, while the contour integral of nothing over the same range is 2*pi*i and not zero. This is a pole in a circular path making the sun a fiery serpent wrapped around a pole. The bible is full of physics in story form.

Anonymous said...

This is an interesting problem because the closer the Hadron Collider scientists try to get to the origin the more it does not compute.

Hector said...

And whoosh it flies over their heads...

Anonymous said...

The attributes are that of an oscillator.

The Barkhausen condition for oscillation is x*y=1. You can change the symbols without changing the meaning of the equation such as Alpha*Omega=1. This produces a man in a circle. To make the oscillator perpetual, x-y=1 is also true.

Solving x*y=1 and x-y=1 we get the Golden Number Phi=1.618.

Without this condition, the universe will cease to exist. This number is used by ancient civilizations around the world. Phi is found in the Parthenon every which way you look at it. It is found in the wall of the Al Aqsa Mosque, Stonehenge, Pyramids in Giza etc. Even the Mayan calendar uses it with the final Baktun cycle lining up with the Gregorian calendar year 1618.

Another attribute of the sun is the use of British numbers. The radius of the sun is 432,000 miles. The Hindu calendar ends in year 432,000. In Norse mythology, Valhalla has 540 doors, 800 men wide. Multiply these numbers and we get 432,000.

If we take pi=3.14 and multiply it by 1000, we get 3140. Now put the earth 7,920 miles wide in a double ellipse produced by Kepler's faulty equation for planetary orbit. It has no origin and cannot be created while putting the earth in two places at the same time.

3140+7920+7920=18980

This is the length of the Mayan calendar in British numbers. Using astronomical reference points which increment every 10,000 Julian days, we can calculate the end of the Mayan calendar December 21 2012. It is 2,000 Pi or 6,283 days from the last astronomical reference point. The beginning of Julian days is -1,500 pi producing a 3,4,5 triangle.

If we take the earth 7,920 miles and split it into two planets, the diameter of each will be 2000 pi or 6,283. Again, these are based on British numbers.

Anonymous said...

Speaking of woosh?

If you spin an object fast enough, it will float in mid air just like a UFO, due to the problem with the Pythagorean Theorem. You can simulate this with a pebble that is capable of spinning. Not all pebbles spin. If you spin the pebble, it will stand on end because the equation of a circle x^2+y^2=1 is the same as the Pythagorean Theorem and does not compute in a flat plane.

Anonymous said...

This makes the origin of the universe, the axis of spin. The vertical component is linear. This is mentioned in the bible as the tree of life, also in Daniel as a tree for the animals to dwell under. The bible also mentions it as Jacob's ladder. It rises from the earth up to heaven.

Mathematicians call this the impulse function. It has a height of infinity and a width of zero.

You can find this again in Einstein's equation of a rectangle E=m*c^2

Area = Length * Width.

(m^.5)*c *(m^.5)*c=m*c^2

E=m*c^2
m=E/c^2
m=E/(meters/seconds)

when meters=zero, mass = infinity.
when seconds=zero mass = zero

Infinity * cosine (0) = infinity
Infinity * cosine (90)= zero

Therefore time and distance are perpendicular and man can travel vertical through time.

If you take the simplest equation for distance 'S', we get S=.5*a*t^2

If we don't care about acceleration 'a' then S=(t^2)/2.

If we walk a straight line from point 'a' to point 'b' time keeps ticking all around us. Therefore multiply the characteristic of time by 2*pi.

We get pi * t^2, or the area of a circle. We can conclude time is round and distance is straight. Einstein said space is warped, but mathematics and anamorphic art tells us this is only in the horizontal plane of the universe. In fact the warp is logarithmic and has no origin at the (x,y) axis. It crosses the 'x' axis at x=1.

To prove this out for sure, we can write a book and pass it from generation to generation containing current events and mathematical proofs. If time is round, we can read the news before it happens, but can't recognize it until after it happens. It is call prophecy.

As you can see, trying to connect all the different characters of religion in the past with the same characteristics proves the information has a common source.

Anonymous said...

There are two proofs of Kepler's equation.

Proof 1:

r=rr1
dr/dt=r(dr1/dt)+(dr/dt)r1

Solving the vector above produces Kepler's ellipse,

r=a/(1+e*cos(theta))

Proof 2:

r1=r/r
d/dt(r/r)=(1/r)dr/dt-1/r^2(dr/dt)r

where the term 1/r means r cannot=0

solving the vector also produces,

r=a/(1+e*cos(theta))

Now, we have the earth in two places at the same time without origin. This violates the rule of differentiable vectors which states a vector is differentiable iff and only iff it is differentiable over the entire domain.

Polar equations can also be converted to rectangular coordinates. You can plot this equation on a graphical calculator. The eccentricity 'e' must be between zero and one for this to be an ellipse. Try .5 to .8 for example using a Cartesian graph. The equation never touches the 'x' axis and cannot be created.

Anonymous said...

The cylinder in a circle also exposes another problem. Archimedes, another fictional character based on one counterfeit manuscript in existence discovered a cylinder is one third cone and two thirds sphere.

Genesis said the water was divided from the water. also, Moses divided the water. It has to be one third cone and two thirds sphere.

If you take a strobe light to falling tap water, you will see a sphere standing in mid air. Taking a cross section above and below the sphere is a cylinder. The space remaining must be the volume of a cone. The sphere is quite happy having its origin on the inside while the cone with its origin at the tip can only touch the sphere on the surface and disintegrates. There can only be one origin.

If you take a high speed image of a splash on a hard surface, you will see a crown made up of upside down vortexes or cones topped with spheres on each cone. Now you can see the sphere and the cone. The sphere and a cone is equivalent to a cylinder, but it is not a cylinder, but an impost-er. We have two systems competing to occupy the space of one system.

Anonymous said...

The Kepler problem leads to the concept of three heavens.

Heaven one:

Ellipse without origin, r=rr1

Heaven two:

Ellipse without origin, r1=r/r

Heaven three:

Put the two ellipses together, and it becomes Ptolemaic because Kepler's ellipses do not exist.

r=r(r/r)
r=r

This equation is linear and has an origin. The trinity says the three are one.

Let r=x
x=x
1=x*1/x
Let y=1/x
1=x*y
y=1/x

This is the Barkhausen condition for oscillation. Plotted on a Cartesian graph it produces a cross occupying quadrants one and three. This leaves an opening in quadrants two and four allowing two to occupy the space of one. The bible says there is double to what is, which scientists haven't figured out yet. By the way, how did scientists measure the mass of the sun when it is empty inside?

Anonymous said...

When two competing systems gang up on another, we get what I believe is called syncretism, first defined in the year 1618?

Anonymous said...

BTW:

The Barkhausen condition for oscillation holds two of every animal just like Noah's Ark. People think Noah's Ark is a boat, but Noah's Ark is not a boat and not a myth.

Anonymous said...

The bible begins to open up when you realize the original language was English and is a modern document. Take for example Achbor the son of Michiah is better known as Mickey Mouse. It also contains words in Macedonian not realized by the translators of English. Zaccai pronounced Zai-Cheh is a bunny rabbit also found in the bible as Bunni and Rabbith.

Anonymous said...

The burning bush does not burn on Mount Sin(a). Here is proof without calculus using the concept of zero.

tan(x)cos(x)=sin(x)

Let r=tan(x)
r=r
r-r=0

rcos(x)=sin(x)
Add nothing
rcos(x)=sin(x)+0
rcos(x)=sin(x)+r-r
r(1+cos(x))=sin(x)+r
r=sin(x)/(1+cos(x))+r/(1+cos(x))
make an ellipse, add eccentricity e
r=sin(x)/(1+ecos(x))+tan(x)/(1+ecos(x))
Let eccentricity = 0
r=sin(x)+tan(x), a double ellipse
But, r=tan(x)

The sin(x) burns up, but tan(x) does not.

Anonymous said...

Here is the equation found in the bible. It is a double ellipse, each diameter 7 and an area of 77 names.

Book of Luke Chaper 3

23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,
24 Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph,
25 Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of Nagge,
26 Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda,
27 Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri,
28 Which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er,
29 Which was the son of Jose, which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi,
30 Which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim,
31 Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David,
32 Which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of Naasson,
33 Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, which was the son of Juda,
34 Which was the son of Jacob, which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, which was the son of Nachor,
35 Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala,
36 Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem, which was the son of Noe, which was the son of Lamech,
37 Which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan,
38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.