Comments on Truth Be Known News | Blog of Acharya S: Oldest New Testament Out of Egypt into Cyberspace

Just wanted to reply to posting by the fellow posi...

2009-06-13T21:18:27.938-05:00

Just wanted to reply to posting by the fellow positing the "Piso Theory." Interesting, but a bit far-fetched. I'll go with Acharya's take on the NT's origin.

Also, the point about quantum theory, or some aspects, requiring a "God" isn't true. If you want to believe, great. I don't. If there is a God (to paraphrase Noam Chomsky), he must be a god of evil.

Matilda Beupine said... What if evidence that J...

2009-03-28T13:16:00.000-05:00

Matilda Beupine said...

What if evidence that Jesus came from tons of other religions doesn't prove his story false? What if it proves his story true? So true that every culture in every time wants to get its hands on that story?

The proliferation of this story reflects its origin as a solar myth.

For more information, please see my books:

The Christ Conspiracy
Suns of God
Who Was Jesus?
Christ in Egypt

I know, Acharya, and I wasn't addressing it to you...

2009-03-28T13:00:00.000-05:00

I know, Acharya, and I wasn't addressing it to you. I was addressing it to anyone who thinks the Piso theory is (this is a figure of speech and I know it's odd to use it when talking about the Piso theory) the Second Coming of Christ.

What if evidence that Jesus came from tons of othe...

2009-03-28T12:55:00.000-05:00

What if evidence that Jesus came from tons of other religions doesn't prove his story false? What if it proves his story true? So true that every culture in every time wants to get its hands on that story? Since when is historical, physical truth the only truth there can ever be? Does the future not count? What if all religions are like performances: bodily enactments of the intuitive/spiritual truth? Even if their authors and actors think they're making a hoax...what if they're really not? What if the hoax is on THEM? What if they're not aware they're moving with a truthful current?

It's impossible to tell a complete lie. Even if you say "I am the Queen of Egypt" when you know you're a Russian-American engineer, you're still saying a mouthful when you say "I am."

I don't subscribe to the Piso theory, and I'm not ...

2009-03-28T12:33:00.000-05:00

I don't subscribe to the Piso theory, and I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a scholar of comparative religion and mythology.

I'd be careful with that Piso/Jesus theory. It's ...

2009-03-28T12:29:00.000-05:00

I'd be careful with that Piso/Jesus theory. It's very one-sided, doesn't consider alternative explanations, doesn't seem aware of basic facts about Roman life and language, and has a clear anti-Christian agenda. The whole reason any of these "scholars" bother to make such a theory is to bring the end of Christianity. It's religious persecution. There's nothing else to call it.

Conspiracy theorists are politicians, not scientists. They do science backwards: make a conclusion and then pick around for "evidence" that points to their conclusion. They're not interesting in dissenting evidence. The magic of conspiracy theories is their built-in mechanism for silencing all opposition: if any facts suggest that the theory is wrong, theorists can write them off as fabrications of the ruling class. Such theories have a lot in common with belief in the supernatural: you can neither prove nor disprove them.

Why does everything we dislike have to be an evil conspiracy? Can't we just let go, and focus on what we DO like? If we hate people, fine. We have the right to hate. But inflating hate into a self-righteous cause is the best way to start wars.

Thanks. Nothing to worry about here, as I would n...

2008-10-26T11:25:00.000-05:00

Thanks. Nothing to worry about here, as I would never use any of York's work.

My book "Christ in Egypt: The Horus-Jesus Connection" uses thousands of ancient Egyptian primary sources, as well as the works of highly credentialed authorities - all carefully quoted and cited, with over 2,200 footnotes, drawing from more than 750 sources.

Here's a sample:

The Nativity Scene at Luxor

I resent the use of the word "plagiarize" and its implications.

It would be a good idea to actually look at someone's work before you make untoward insinuations towards them.

Utcha, (Salutations)Eye see that you have a book c...

2008-10-26T07:43:00.000-05:00

Utcha, (Salutations)

Eye see that you have a book coming out entitled "Chrits in Egipt".
Eye hope that it is filled with facts as that book has Already been Published http://alleyesonegypt.net/catalog/item/312508/71366.htm going on 5 years now, Written by My Master Teacher the Noble Malachai Z.York EL 720.

Eye only hope that you are not Plagiarizing his work to gain fame. as only he can dispell the Ancient Egiptian Mysteries with Facts no assumptions and Theories.

Since The Gov. has illegally kidnapped him in an effort to stop the spread of the Truth it is mine and my Nations mission to free him and continue to Set The Record strait.

God Came Out Of Egipt

Nuwaubic Is The Most Ancient
Of Tongues And is From Egypt.
GOD Himself, Says He Is From Egypt!

Read Your Bible: Book Of Hosea 13:4
Hosea 13:4
"Yet I am the LORD thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no god but me: for there is no Saviour beside me."

"God Came Out Of Egipt"

Why spell Egipt with an "i"?

…The original letter yod of Hebrew and Arabic was taken from the original "i" of Cuneiform or Nuwaubic, the original name of the script Cuneiform, which symbol was in actuality an eye, as you see in the word eye, the letter y is trapped between two e's, for there is another letter in the Semetic languages that have the same sound "E", and it's called ah'yin in Hebrew and a'iyn in Arabic, which is the initial sound of the tone, "Aum". As seen used in the Sanskrit symbol for Aum. It symbolizes seeing is not believing, but rather seeing is knowing; hearing is believing. The all eye seeing, the all seeing eye. In our revelations we use the letter "i" instead of "y" because "i" is the nineth letter and it better suits our order, being that nine is the highest number.

We want to impress upon our Christian Brothers and Sisters who study the Bible the importance of realizing that your Bible was not revealed in the Language that you speak here in America referred to as English. Indeed since GOD came out of Egipt we should ask ourselves "What Language did the Egiptians speak?" The answer is Medu Neter, which is Nuwaubic and is translated "Words of God". The Greeks came along and renamed our Language "Hieroglphics", which is translated into English as "Sacred Writings.

So again Eye Hope that you are not trying to stake claim to Knowledge that is already out there. I applaud you efforts though asthe truth must be know but @ what cost?

The Knowledge we as The Tamareans (Egiptians) posess goes beyond this solar system, so pleas be careful in you works as there are those out to decieve you all.

Hotep Wa A'shug Antuten
Nebu Atun-Re Rameses

Acharya, what is your take on the "Magdalen Papyru...

2008-08-01T01:47:00.000-05:00

Acharya, what is your take on the "Magdalen Papyrus" dated by papyrologist CP Thiede at pre-66AD?

The world will finally know the truth.http://www.v...

2008-07-25T15:36:00.000-05:00

The world will finally know the truth.

http://www.vloggingtheapocalypse.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=649&title=The_Divine_Chi___Tree_of_No_Ledge

http://www.vloggingtheapocalypse.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=670&title=The_Holy_Bible____The_Book_of_Inversions_

No, my dear Mriana, I missed nothing. It is you wh...

2008-07-25T12:31:00.000-05:00

No, my dear Mriana, I missed nothing. It is you who missed what I was saying (in plain English). No matter, I shall drift away from this blog as silently as I entered. Please do not reply to this post. --jws

Joe, I think you missed a WHOLE lot of things in w...

2008-07-25T11:10:00.000-05:00

Joe, I think you missed a WHOLE lot of things in what I said. I did say everything is here on earth and denied any thoughts of an afterlife, there are no gods or anything else in my view. Wherever you got that, maybe a confusion between pointing out religious ideology and the reality of things. Whatever you are saying is religious in my post, esp when I pointed out that their own texts point to no afterlife, I have no clue. IMHO, whatever beef you have with anything I said, it's rediculous, because if what you say is true, then Acharya is right, we are on the same side and have no need for such animosity between us.

Romeo, I get so tired of such attacks on Acharya. Why can't Acharya be herself instead of believing what you believe? Why does she have to believe as you do? You, and other Xians who drop in spouting off their ideology, remind me of the Tao story of emperors Dramatic, Change, and Chaos, but you probably don't know that story. Even so, the moral of that story is forcing people to be like everyone else is not a good thing, but rather it is a bad thing. I doubt you can change Acharya, but IF you could and did, I don't think you would be so happy with the results in the long run. Why not just let her be and not try to impose your deity on her?

Romeo Steele said...Your search for "credible scie...

2008-07-25T10:54:00.000-05:00

Romeo Steele said...

Your search for "credible scientific evidence" for the historical existence of Jesus Christ has always been doomed from the start, as you have not taken into consideration alternate paradigms for solutions to certain mysteries or serendipities which may have confused you.

(Reconsider your position, Acharya: What if there is a God?)

Yes, but I'm talking about what has really occurred on the THIRD DIMENSION as HISTORY, which we can perfectly comprehend without all the mystical mumbo-jumbo. Regardless of what you or Grant Jeffrey come up with, the fact will remain that in the THIRD DIMENSION there remains no evidence for the existence of the New Testament character called "Jesus Christ" and everything points to him being as mythical as Hercules.

Or are you suggesting that Hercules too was a "real person," followed by some confabulated satanic conspiracy theory to prove that notion? If so, then the GREEK son of God would be just as legitimate as the Jewish son of God.

And speaking of God, you do not know what my position on God is, so you remark above is absurdly condescending, as is your presumption that I am "confused." Just because someone doesn't believe in Jesus Christ as a historical figure who actually appeared in the third dimension doesn't mean s/he doesn't believe in God. You are confusing the two concepts.

If you don't believe in Hercules as a historical figure, does that mean you don't believe in God? If you were a follower of Greek religion 2,500 years ago, someone like you might erroneously suspect that you didn't believe in God because you questioned the historical reality of Hercules.

That being said, I certainly do not believe in the God depicted in the Bible or the Koran or any other so-called sacred text. These are manmade artifacts that cannot contain what we define as "God."

See my essay, What is God?

Hi. I'm the guy who left the comment about the Pi...

2008-07-25T04:21:00.000-05:00

Hi. I'm the guy who left the comment about the Pisos, to which you replied about a multinational cabal and brotherhoods, etc. I want to know if you've read Reuchlin's book. He talks about a code the Pisos used to identify their work, and he shows examples of that code in The New Testament, and in the works of Josepus ... whom Reuchlin asserts is a pen-name of one of the Pisos. I'm actually in agreement with what you say about a multinational cabal and brotherhoods; however, I believe that Reuchlin presents a tight case in his book, so I'm suggesting that the Pisos were in a leadership position in that cabal. I'm suggesting that that cabal/brotherhood filtered information to the Pisos and that the Pisos were the compilers/writers. If you haven't read Reuchlin's book, please read it. It's rare, and you might not be able to get a copy of it, but I do have a photocopy of the entire book. If you've never read it, and if you want to read it, and if you can't find a copy, we can make arrangements to mail a photocopy to you if you e-mail me at newlegend2005@yahoo.ca

Dear Acharya, Although I do not agree with your...

2008-07-25T02:33:00.000-05:00

Dear Acharya,
Although I do not agree with your theories, still I respect your right to free expression. May I humbly suggest you research the book "The Mysterious Bible Codes" by Grant R. Jeffrey and similar publications, like that of Yacov Rambsel. Your search for "credible scientific evidence" for the historical existence of Jesus Christ has always been doomed from the start, as you have not taken into consideration alternate paradigms for solutions to certain mysteries or serendipities which may have confused you. Still, I wish you well and hope and pray someday that you will realize that science cannot always answer the many other questions that only faith, balanced with reason, can answer.
Nor can we afford to ignore other factors in this equation, like the world of the supernatural, of documented divine healings or all kinds of miracles that have happened to all kinds of people all over the world, or of exorcisms, or of incorruptible bodies like that of St. Bernadette which you can see or investigate for yourself, or of people who have been clinically dead and come back to life (or even people who have even been raised from the dead even in this modern era) and so on and on. You're a highly intelligent woman, Acharya, though some people may like to suspect that you are under the secret pay of the international power elite known as the Illuminati, those secret, super-rich, sophisticated Satanists who have been financing all kinds of mischief - bloody revolutions, world wars, political assassinations, genocides, HAARP weather warfare, killer virus catastrophes, hypnotized suicide bomber missions, chem trail actions, GMO, supression of cancer cures and breakthrough technologies, etc. --- not to forget their usual stuff like secret codes, rituals and other horrors like sex slaveries and human sacrifices ---as their ultimate goals include spreading their sabbatean Luciferianism, their one world government/global totalitarian rule, their microchip implant spysurveillance/cashless economy schemes...and now with their control of an interlocked world economy, their deliberate debacling of the Oil and Food issues...to their longterm sinister agenda, of course. Do you know that the Illuminati - that upper level Cryptocracy networked around America, Britain and Western Europe openly admit their support of "depopulation programs" (talk to Henry Kissinger) or that they have no loyalty or patriotism feeling for any country, since they see the ideas of national sovereignty, political liberties and basic rights as stumbling blocks to their Globalist Conspiracy? And standing in their way are the Christians - and other good-hearted religionists of other faiths - who STILL believe in democracy, liberty, human rights and basic freedoms. That's why the Illuminati hate them so much, as these good people stand against everything these Mass Murder Mammonists live for: death, destruction, decadence, decay and demonism -- and their philosophy is Lie-Cheat-Kill-Steal...and they allow themselves to be possessed, and they enjoy being possessed...as they go about their way with their Crimes Against Humanity as World Class Psychopaths.
Take a quiet time one sweet night and look at the stars, and remember the words of a poet: "My soul, there is golden country far beyond the stars."
When the following day breaks forth, perhaps you would like to paraphrase 2 Peter 2:19 and make a positive affirmation mantram out of it, and as you wake up in bed or go to the window or make a stretch out in the new day light, you can speak forth:
like a lamp shining
in the darkness until
the dawning of the day
and the morning star
rises in my heart
(Reconsider your position, Acharya: What if there is a God?)
Take care of yourself.
Sincerely yours,
Romeo Steele

Mriana pontificated:“Joe, my diatribe is hardly do...

2008-07-25T02:07:00.000-05:00

Mriana pontificated:
“Joe, my diatribe is hardly dogmatic and I have no church or god of any religion. Again, whatever you are talking about makes no sense and just sounds like a bunch of dogmatic religious mumbo jumbo to me. Seems to me you don't know what you are talking about and just spouting off a bunch of things, even repeating those things, which are meaningless. It may not be of the Christian doctrine, but it still sounds like religious theology to me.”

Mriana, had you simply asked me about my theory on Dynamic Information I would have gladly answered you. But to listen to you spout off your own brand of religious invective is not conducive to adult conversation.

My theory is strictly scientific. It needs no gods, devils, angels or saviors to “make it work”. If you are familiar with Michio Kaku’s multi-(hyper)-dimensional model as a mutual starting point I’d be happy to tell you about 30 years of work on my theory. If you are not familiar with hyper-dimensional physics, don’t attempt to waste my time pretending you do.

Your mother was alluding to the fact that heaven without her pet would not be heaven. I have no idea what your mother’s definition of heaven is/was; there are as many definitions of heaven as there are human beings. But I do know, from experience that my first pet dog (actually my best friend) meant more to me than many so-called human beings. That is what I was alluding to when I stated my opinion, concerning your mother/pet/heaven.

When I use words, such as “other side” you will notice I put them in “” because there is, in reality, no “other side”. Everything is “here” (notice the “” around here). If you understand quantum physics you will know the simple meaning of this phrase.

Yes, I have names for all of my concepts. I’m afraid you will not know the language but that makes no difference to me – you can be silent and learn or you can keep butting in with your annoying whining. Do you want to learn or not?

When I started posting here I did not think the topic was worth using any type of science type language, after all, the topic is about a myth wrapped in an enigma, pretending to be something other than rational thought. Nor do I cast my pearls before swine. If I do reveal my theory, in essence, you will not have the benefit of the key to make it work. That key will never be written down on paper. It will, however be handed down to certain “guardians” who will judge when the time is right for said key to be inserted. The military uses of my theory (if totally revealed) would be just enough to enslave mankind, sooner than later. I will not be a party to that.

But the main body of my theory is interesting enough without the key. With this in mind and subject to my above qualifications, let me know if you’d like to hear it. --jws

IF we are on the same side, why does he come acros...

2008-07-25T01:58:00.000-05:00

IF we are on the same side, why does he come across as some New Ager? And why does he sound like he thinks I have a religion? Gee, I thought that was clear when I said it was all right here and there is no afterlife. I wasn't talking Xian dogma or theology, but I did use a few of their texts against them to show my point that it is all right here.

No, Joe, I don't think you are a Christian, but I do get the impression that you believe in something or at least talking about something and it's not quite atheism though, but I can't put my finger on it. Clarification of words would be helpful or at least clarifying the ideology for those words.

I'm not even sure if he is still talking about Xianity specifically or what. Could be Shintoism for all I know, but I'm not sure how this, specifically Japan, is hell for the Kami though. And how in the world are Kami tied to only one little island and that island, or series of islands, somehow doesn't get overpopulated with humans, animals, and Kami?

Um... never mind. I am now digressing.

Anonymous said... so what about the jewish god?...

2008-07-25T01:29:00.000-05:00

Anonymous said...

so what about the jewish god?, whats your stand point?

The Jewish god is just that, a Jewish cultural artifact. None of these "sacred texts" such as the Bible or Koran contains anything that could remotely be called "the god of the cosmos." Such a god by its definition could not be contained or described in a book, certainly not one written by a bunch of petty humans in an tiny isolated spot 2500 or more years ago.

The Egyptians had a far richer perception of reality, much more cosmic, as would befit any such god, should we choose to conceive one. The reduction of the fabulous Egyptian religion to what is found in the Bible or the Koran represents the real blasphemy!

Blecch. We've been gypped.

so what about the jewish god?, whats your stand po...

2008-07-25T01:20:00.000-05:00

so what about the jewish god?, whats your stand point?

Not sure what the dilemma is here with Mriana and ...

2008-07-25T00:55:00.000-05:00

Not sure what the dilemma is here with Mriana and Joe - you seem to be on the same "side" as concerns religion, mythology and Christianity, etc.

Joe, my diatribe is hardly dogmatic and I have no ...

2008-07-25T00:45:00.000-05:00

Joe, my diatribe is hardly dogmatic and I have no church or god of any religion. Again, whatever you are talking about makes no sense and just sounds like a bunch of dogmatic religious mumbo jumbo to me. Seems to me you don't know what you are talking about and just spouting off a bunch of things, even repeating those things, which are meaningless. It may not be of the Christian doctrine, but it still sounds like religious theology to me.

What "other side"? Do you have a name or a concept for this "other side"? What is "spirit to body to spirit phenomenon"? I don't know what the heck you are talking about, thus it makes no sense. Where is "there"? What is "there"? (I mean what is the place, not what will be there) What "soaring spirit"? What is a "soaring spirit"? Which "God theory" are you talking about? Judaism, Christian, Buddhism, Hinduism, Shinto, New Age? How do you preceive my mother is correct and I am wrong?

Without clarification or definition your words have no meaning and could even be New Age theological words for all I know. You may be using English words, but the words are empty in meaning. It's like saying "the Path to Salvation" to a person who has no idea of Evangelical theology or even experienced that theology. Even they would not understand and would ask what it is. Until they know what it is, those words would have no meaning to them.

Until such words are clarified, it is just religious mumbo jumbo with no essence to it.

Against my better judgment I'll answer your dogmat...

2008-07-24T21:56:00.000-05:00

Against my better judgment I'll answer your dogmattic diatribe by merely posting, in chronological order, my contributions to this blog. If there is anywhere in these posts even the slightest hint that I might be a Christian, then you, Mriana, need glasses. Also, don't ask me to join your church -- you need believers and I just don't have the patience, my dear... --jws

Joe said...
Another chapter in the mythological opus known as Christianity. Some day, when the editors get it right, it will become the official international last word in a fictional account of a mythical being. Since there are so many Christian factions and sects, I doubt any editor will ever get it right! --jws
3:22 AM

Joe said...
While most, if not all, ancient myths have a grain of truth in them, not unlike the science-fiction of today, it might be beneficial for those who believe in the whole "bible story" to read the Earth Chronicles, written by Zecharia Sitchin. Sitchin takes the interpretation of ancient myth to a whole new level. He paints a picture that more than rivals all of Christianity's and Judaism's fables. In a nut-shell, Sitchin's interpretation of "the creation of mankind" is more believable than the old and new testament. Please don't take my word for it -- check it out for yourselves... --jws
12:57 PM

Joe said...
If there was a God and I were He.

Personally, I think the God theory is too flawed to be tested: an a-priori statement is just that, no proof is either forthcoming or necessary for those who make the statement or believe it.

All I can say on the matter is this: If I were God, I would never have allowed any human being to know it. Humans would have to live out their lives without the promise of eternal reward and without the fear of eternal punishment. That way humans would more closely act out their lives as the "real" people they are.

The only imperative would be a categorical imperative: "Treat every human being as an end and not a means to an end."

All else seems to be a self-serving waste of effort... --jws
7:45 PM

Joe said...
Emanuel Kant is the author of the "Categorical imperative".

Where did lightning come from? That's easy: from nothing. Beginnings and endings can only deal with "somethings" in a 3-dimensional universe. But a 3-dimensional universe can only be half of the "picture" at best. The other half? A non-3 dimensional universe. A non-3 dimensional universe, then, would of necessity be a nothing (no thing) universe. Therefore, lightning (which is something)would have to come from something called nothing. The speed of light is not a barrier -- the speed of light is the central point of physical and non-physical existence. To live in a non-physical state one has merely to think past the speed of light.

I know this from personal experience... --jws
10:28 PM

Joe said...
"So why waste your life trying to conceive of something that probably doesn't exist or IF it does, it is totally beyond anything you can conceive of."

1)Poor logic: Nothing "conceived" can be inconceivable.

2)Something unthought of is just that -- unthought of.

Ah, but, the wonders of thinking past the speed of light in what I call a "Dynamic Information Universe" -- now THAT is something else again!

What is life but perception, the illusion of pain and pleasure and death?

If life-giving nutrients are harvested from fertilized soil, think what this earth is to the soaring spirit! Hell!

We are non-physical spirit projected into physical bodies. We incubate, we mature, we return to our real home -- spirit.

Are Gods and Angels involved with this process? No need for them. The cycle from spirit to body to spirit is a natural phenomenon which requires no Gods or Angels. But, one might ask, "what is on the other side?"

My answer: Wait and see, if you are unhappy here you will probably be unhappy "there". --jws
11:35 PM

Joe said...
Mriana, you evidently didn't read past my "poor logic" statement. That's a shame. Also, your mother was correct. Pets possess an unconditional love unrivaled by mere humans. --jws
11:54 AM

Now, my dear, if you cannot understand the written word, try a different language, more suited to your temperment. --jws

I didn't say I was correct, Joe. I gave my view i...

2008-07-24T17:17:00.000-05:00

I didn't say I was correct, Joe. I gave my view in both religious (which was not Xian dogma or doctrine or any specific religious doctrine for that matter) and scientific terms. I also used a variety of written skills to communicate my views. Furthermore, I asked you how my mother was correct and stated that you didn't make any sense.

Obviously you can't explain yourself, otherwise you would have made a much better attempt. At least I made the attempt to explain my POV in great detail using many written techniques and skills, as well as used religious texts that supported my view in order to appease those with religious views, specifically Xian. You have done neither nor anything else to explain in terms that make any sense to the religious and/or non-religious. You've only given brief statements, sometimes using only one or two sentences. Such brief statements give no clarity to one's view. Seems to me you don't know how to explain anything, not even in metaphor, similie, any other use of literary techniques, or even scientific evidence. Therefore, it also appears you need to learn some written communication skills, besides religious dogma that was drilled into you.

Give me some coherent statements explaining your position and maybe we can discuss your views. Short and brief statements don't cut the mustard. (That last sentence is use of cliche.)

Yes, Mriana, you must be correct, you certainly th...

2008-07-24T15:35:00.000-05:00

Yes, Mriana, you must be correct, you certainly think so. Bye-bye! --jws

Joe said... Mriana, you evidently didn't read past...

2008-07-24T13:20:00.000-05:00

Joe said...
Mriana, you evidently didn't read past my "poor logic" statement. That's a shame. Also, your mother was correct. Pets possess an unconditional love unrivaled by mere humans. --jws

No, I read your whole post, just as I did now. You make no sense, esp with this post. Maybe if you could be more coherent, maybe we would understand each other better. Your simple statements don't even have any clear explainations, much less any scientific support.

And just how is my mother correct when everything she describes is right here. I'd say it is time for everyone to open their eyes and face reality, instead of living in a delusional fantasy world. This delusion is probably why believers are rarely coherent.